Ready.
Social-evolutionism is a cruel thing -- as we all know. I also notice that (some?)social-evolutionists would like to cripple themselves. It seems, they crave to bring hell, upon themselves, while still in this world. An example was the excerpts on a Knowledge@Wharton page: "If he ruled the world": Carl Icahn In a subsection titled "Survival of the Unfittest," Mr. Icahn voices his opposition to the non-evolutionary nature of CEO selection, in [some] companies. He seems to hope a weight with such slogans. Does Mr. Icahn try to base the corporate structure on "mutations?" He thinks "not to rock the boat" is not a virtue. If the boat/giant turns over, people pay.
His evolutionistic commentary, is suggestive of a pecking-order, not a team. That would need the CEO, not only to ably fight till top, but also have his/her full-view for each act/intricacy of that corporation. A gladiator scenario, where the winner is dutifully served by all the other people he has crushed. No [bureaucratic] feet-dragger, etc.
That is an example, how vaporware evolutionism is. People make their own slogans, and instead of try to deal with the issues, they think they gain "scientific weight" with empty slogans. The word evolutionism stands there, only to commit to excesses. Yes, some other evolutionist people may point out the weak-point in his case, but probably themselves would commit to some other excess (in their turn, to help the CEO against the mutations).
The Knowledge@Wharton people, have tamed that page, as they have not only reported his views, but also a glimpse of the issue. The thing is the original tension, of a firm "versus" the risk/investor. In the corporate-and-shareholders model, there seems no way out of that dilemma. A free-market is a remedy, though, as I had already reflected, around (the thoroughly-Islamic) firmaze and the related (farmaze, infirmaze, RRRR, etc).
In a firmaze, the firmer-people are those who do not rock their boat (in the world we know, that is most reminiscent of a film-studio, or other such piecemeal-offer/risk imaginer). In contrast, the free-market people (hedge-fund, etc.) arrange their finance-strategies, around those offered investment alternatives (e.g: invest in "Terminator IV," do not invest in a horror-film). At the end, if the invested amount is earned, the firmer people also get their piece out of the pie. If there is loss, they do not earn even a cent. The way Islam is against usury/interest, the risk of bankruptcy is essentially null (that is, except litigations, in case the good-or-service may have hurt people).